<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>International Law Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internationallawupdate.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com</link>
	<description>A monthly report on public &#38; private international legal developments</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:47:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In litigation involving U.S. citizen with U.S. residence who also had Canadian residence where he spent most of his time as business consultant, Canadian Federal Court of Appeal interprets Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) to require that U.S. citizen should pay Canadian taxes on his business income earned in Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-litigation-involving-u-s-citizen-with-u-s-residence-who-also-had-canadian-residence-where-he-spent-most-of-his-time-as-business-consultant-canadian-federal-court-of-appeal-interprets-canada-unit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-litigation-involving-u-s-citizen-with-u-s-residence-who-also-had-canadian-residence-where-he-spent-most-of-his-time-as-business-consultant-canadian-federal-court-of-appeal-interprets-canada-unit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TAXATION]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In litigation involving U.S. citizen with U.S. residence who also had Canadian residence where he spent most of his time as business consultant, Canadian Federal Court of Appeal interprets Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) to require that U.S. citizen should pay Canadian taxes on his business income earned in Canada Since 2000, R. H. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-litigation-involving-u-s-citizen-with-u-s-residence-who-also-had-canadian-residence-where-he-spent-most-of-his-time-as-business-consultant-canadian-federal-court-of-appeal-interprets-canada-unit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Plaintiffs obtained $2.6 billion default judgment against Iran under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act for its involvement in 1983 suicide bombing of United States military barracks in Lebanon, Ninth Circuit raises “immunity from execution” defense sua sponte and affirms dismissal of case</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/where-plaintiffs-obtained-2-6-billion-default-judgment-against-iran-under-foreign-sovereign-immunities-act-for-its-involvement-in-1983-suicide-bombing-of-united-states-military-barracks-in-lebanon-n/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/where-plaintiffs-obtained-2-6-billion-default-judgment-against-iran-under-foreign-sovereign-immunities-act-for-its-involvement-in-1983-suicide-bombing-of-united-states-military-barracks-in-lebanon-n/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where Plaintiffs obtained $2.6 billion default judgment against Iran under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act for its involvement in 1983 suicide bombing of United States military barracks in Lebanon, Ninth Circuit raises “immunity from execution” defense sua sponte and affirms dismissal of case In October 1983, a suicide bomber drove a truck loaded with explosives into [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/where-plaintiffs-obtained-2-6-billion-default-judgment-against-iran-under-foreign-sovereign-immunities-act-for-its-involvement-in-1983-suicide-bombing-of-united-states-military-barracks-in-lebanon-n/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In reviewing conviction for drug crimes committed by crew of vessel on high seas that lacked customary indicia of its nationality, First Circuit interprets Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA) to support criminal jurisdiction of U.S. federal court over violators</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-reviewing-conviction-for-drug-crimes-committed-by-crew-of-vessel-on-high-seas-that-lacked-customary-indicia-of-its-nationality-first-circuit-interprets-maritime-drug-law-enforcement-act-mdlea-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-reviewing-conviction-for-drug-crimes-committed-by-crew-of-vessel-on-high-seas-that-lacked-customary-indicia-of-its-nationality-first-circuit-interprets-maritime-drug-law-enforcement-act-mdlea-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MARITIME CRIMINAL JURISDICTION]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reviewing conviction for drug crimes committed by crew of vessel on high seas that lacked customary indicia of its nationality, First Circuit interprets Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA) to support criminal jurisdiction of U.S. federal court over violators A U.S. Coast Guard helicopter observed a low-flying airplane dropping bales into the sea (later [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-reviewing-conviction-for-drug-crimes-committed-by-crew-of-vessel-on-high-seas-that-lacked-customary-indicia-of-its-nationality-first-circuit-interprets-maritime-drug-law-enforcement-act-mdlea-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In underlying contract dispute between United Kingdom and Virginia companies where language in forum selection clause makes such disputes “subject to jurisdiction” of United Kingdom courts, Fourth Circuit determines that U.S. Supreme Court’s 1972 ruling in The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. seems to favor enforcement of such clauses in international context</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-underlying-contract-dispute-between-united-kingdom-and-virginia-companies-where-language-in-forum-selection-clause-makes-such-disputes-%e2%80%9csubject-to-jurisdiction%e2%80%9d-of-united-kingdom-co/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-underlying-contract-dispute-between-united-kingdom-and-virginia-companies-where-language-in-forum-selection-clause-makes-such-disputes-%e2%80%9csubject-to-jurisdiction%e2%80%9d-of-united-kingdom-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:39:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In underlying contract dispute between United Kingdom and Virginia companies where language in forum selection clause makes such disputes “subject to jurisdiction” of United Kingdom courts, Fourth Circuit determines that U.S. Supreme Court’s 1972 ruling in The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co. seems to favor enforcement of such clauses in international context In 2005, a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-underlying-contract-dispute-between-united-kingdom-and-virginia-companies-where-language-in-forum-selection-clause-makes-such-disputes-%e2%80%9csubject-to-jurisdiction%e2%80%9d-of-united-kingdom-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit reverses dismissal of Peruvian tribal lawsuit against Occidental Oil Company over its oil pollution in Peru because [1] Defendant failed to show that Peru is in fact more convenient forum than U.S.; [2] Defendant failed to overcome strong presumption in favor of Plaintiffs’ choice of forum; and [3] district court failed to impose mitigating conditions upon dismissal</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/ninth-circuit-reverses-dismissal-of-peruvian-tribal-lawsuit-against-occidental-oil-company-over-its-oil-pollution-in-peru-because-1-defendant-failed-to-show-that-peru-is-in-fact-more-convenient-foru/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/ninth-circuit-reverses-dismissal-of-peruvian-tribal-lawsuit-against-occidental-oil-company-over-its-oil-pollution-in-peru-because-1-defendant-failed-to-show-that-peru-is-in-fact-more-convenient-foru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 01:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Issue 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FORUM NON CONVENIENS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ninth Circuit reverses dismissal of Peruvian tribal lawsuit against Occidental Oil Company over its oil pollution in Peru because [1] Defendant failed to show that Peru is in fact more convenient forum than U.S.; [2] Defendant failed to overcome strong presumption in favor of Plaintiffs’ choice of forum; and [3] district court failed to impose [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/ninth-circuit-reverses-dismissal-of-peruvian-tribal-lawsuit-against-occidental-oil-company-over-its-oil-pollution-in-peru-because-1-defendant-failed-to-show-that-peru-is-in-fact-more-convenient-foru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In reviewing conviction of American wife for murdering her American husband while both resided in Hong Kong, its highest court’s main basis for reversing and remanding case for new trial was that trial court had failed to correct final argument of prosecution that jury could consider Victim’s hearsay statements that Defendant was trying to poison Victim as affirmative evidence that she did in fact make such attempts</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-reviewing-conviction-of-american-wife-for-murdering-her-american-husband-while-both-resided-in-hong-kong-its-highest-court%e2%80%99s-main-basis-for-reversing-and-remanding-case-for-new-trial-was-t/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-reviewing-conviction-of-american-wife-for-murdering-her-american-husband-while-both-resided-in-hong-kong-its-highest-court%e2%80%99s-main-basis-for-reversing-and-remanding-case-for-new-trial-was-t/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 International Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issue 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EVIDENCE RULES IN FOREIGN COURTS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EVIDENCE RULES IN FOREIGN COURTS In reviewing conviction of American wife for murdering her American husband while both resided in Hong Kong, its highest court’s main basis for reversing and remanding case for new trial was that trial court had failed to correct final argument of prosecution that jury could consider Victim’s hearsay statements that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-reviewing-conviction-of-american-wife-for-murdering-her-american-husband-while-both-resided-in-hong-kong-its-highest-court%e2%80%99s-main-basis-for-reversing-and-remanding-case-for-new-trial-was-t/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Iraqi Plaintiff seeks U.S. compensation for property damage during U.S. military occupation of home in Battle of Fallujah, U.S. Court of Federal Claims dismisses [1] for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because property damage occurred during hostile action; Court also rejects novel theories [2] that U.S. is liable based on its effective exercise of sovereignty over Iraq, and [3] that Plaintiff has pleaded facts showing contractual duty to repay</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/where-iraqi-plaintiff-seeks-u-s-compensation-for-property-damage-during-u-s-military-occupation-of-home-in-battle-of-fallujah-u-s-court-of-federal-claims-dismisses-1-for-lack-of-subject-matter-j/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/where-iraqi-plaintiff-seeks-u-s-compensation-for-property-damage-during-u-s-military-occupation-of-home-in-battle-of-fallujah-u-s-court-of-federal-claims-dismisses-1-for-lack-of-subject-matter-j/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 International Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issue 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMBAT DAMAGES AS COMPENSABLE TAKINGS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[COMBAT DAMAGES AS COMPENSABLE TAKINGS &#160; Where Iraqi Plaintiff seeks U.S. compensation for property damage during U.S. military occupation of home in Battle of Fallujah, U.S. Court of Federal Claims dismisses [1] for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because property damage occurred during hostile action; Court also rejects novel theories [2] that U.S. is liable [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/where-iraqi-plaintiff-seeks-u-s-compensation-for-property-damage-during-u-s-military-occupation-of-home-in-battle-of-fallujah-u-s-court-of-federal-claims-dismisses-1-for-lack-of-subject-matter-j/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In case where evidence that Guantanamo Bay detainee was active part of al‑Qaida at time of arrest was thin, District of Columbia Circuit vacates grant of habeas corpus for district court to conduct additional fact finding in light of intervening District of Columbia circuit precedents on sufficiency of evidence that petitioner was active agent of al‑Qaida</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-case-where-evidence-that-guantanamo-bay-detainee-was-active-part-of-al%e2%80%91qaida-at-time-of-arrest-was-thin-district-of-columbia-circuit-vacates-grant-of-habeas-corpus-for-district-court-to-co/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-case-where-evidence-that-guantanamo-bay-detainee-was-active-part-of-al%e2%80%91qaida-at-time-of-arrest-was-thin-district-of-columbia-circuit-vacates-grant-of-habeas-corpus-for-district-court-to-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 International Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issue 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM &#160; In case where evidence that Guantanamo Bay detainee was active part of al‑Qaida at time of arrest was thin, District of Columbia Circuit vacates grant of habeas corpus for district court to conduct additional fact finding in light of intervening District of Columbia circuit precedents on sufficiency of evidence that petitioner was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/in-case-where-evidence-that-guantanamo-bay-detainee-was-active-part-of-al%e2%80%91qaida-at-time-of-arrest-was-thin-district-of-columbia-circuit-vacates-grant-of-habeas-corpus-for-district-court-to-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WTO Dispute Settlement Panel issues mixed report in United States‑China dispute over United States anti‑dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese steel pipes, off‑road tires, rectangular pipes and tubes and laminated woven sacks</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/wto-dispute-settlement-panel-issues-mixed-report-in-united-states%e2%80%91china-dispute-over-united-states-anti%e2%80%91dumping-and-countervailing-duties-on-chinese-steel-pipes-off%e2%80%91road-tires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/wto-dispute-settlement-panel-issues-mixed-report-in-united-states%e2%80%91china-dispute-over-united-states-anti%e2%80%91dumping-and-countervailing-duties-on-chinese-steel-pipes-off%e2%80%91road-tires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 International Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issue 11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO) &#160; WTO Dispute Settlement Panel issues mixed report in United States‑China dispute over United States anti‑dumping and countervailing duties on Chinese steel pipes, off‑road tires, rectangular pipes and tubes and laminated woven sacks &#160; &#160; A Dispute Settlement Panel [DSP] of the World Trade Organization (WTO) issued its Report in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/wto-dispute-settlement-panel-issues-mixed-report-in-united-states%e2%80%91china-dispute-over-united-states-anti%e2%80%91dumping-and-countervailing-duties-on-chinese-steel-pipes-off%e2%80%91road-tires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Second Circuit holds that, in ATCA cases alleging violations of customary international law, courts must determine scope of tort liability by customary international law itself; corporate liability for its own wrongdoing is not a universally recognized norm of customary international law</title>
		<link>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/second-circuit-holds-that-in-atca-cases-alleging-violations-of-customary-international-law-courts-must-determine-scope-of-tort-liability-by-customary-international-law-itself-corporate-liability-fo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/second-circuit-holds-that-in-atca-cases-alleging-violations-of-customary-international-law-courts-must-determine-scope-of-tort-liability-by-customary-international-law-itself-corporate-liability-fo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 17:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010 International Law Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issue 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT (ACTA)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internationallawupdate.com/?p=3575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT (ACTA) &#160; Second Circuit holds that, in ATCA cases alleging violations of customary international law, courts must determine scope of tort liability by customary international law itself; corporate liability for its own wrongdoing is not a universally recognized norm of customary international law &#160; The Plaintiffs in the following case are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.internationallawupdate.com/10/second-circuit-holds-that-in-atca-cases-alleging-violations-of-customary-international-law-courts-must-determine-scope-of-tort-liability-by-customary-international-law-itself-corporate-liability-fo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

