Browse the archives

Archives >

   2005 International Law Update, Volume 11, Number 3 (March)

Browse the articles in this issue.




  • ARBITRATION, REVIEW OF
    Ontario Court of Appeals turns down Mexico’s challenge of ICSID arbitration award to U.S. company denied “national treatment” in violation of NAFTA
  • CONTRACTS (ESPIONAGE)
    U.S. Supreme Court holds that former spies cannot use U.S. courts to enforce compensation agreements for espionage services
  • JUDGMENTS(ANTITERRORISM ACT)
    Reviewing attempt to enforce judgment against Iran by levying on its U.S. property, Second Circuit rules that plaintiffs had relinquished such rights by accepting payments under Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act
  • JUDICIAL PROCEDURE, TRANSNATIONAL
    In House of Lords, majority rules that it did not violate English public or judicial policy to allow French plaintiff in English libel suit to present his trial testimony by video link where he declines to appear in person for fear of extradition to United States as fugitive from imprisonment for admitted sex crime
  • JUDICIAL PROCEDURES, UNDUE LENGTH OF
    European Court of Human Rights rules that Austrian courts breached Article 6(1) of Human Rights Convention in taking five years with long periods of inaction to decide enforceability of Michigan divorce decree sought by U.S. husband against Austrian wife who had abducted their daughter from U.S.
  • VIENNA CONVENTION
    Oregon Supreme Court holds that Vienna Convention does not create rights that individual foreign nationals may assert in U.S. criminal proceedings
  • WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
    In later phase of banana importation dispute among U.S., EU and Ecuador, European Court of Justice holds that legal persons such as banana importers lack standing to plead incompatibility of EU laws with WTO trading rules in Member State courts





Not to be reproduced in any form or media without the prior written permission of the publisher. This publication is designed to provide accurate information regarding the subject matter covered, and is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. The advertisements displayed on this medium are do not express the views of International Law Update.