Browse the archives

Archives >

   2006 International Law Update, Volume 12, Number 7 (July)

Browse the articles in this issue.




  • CONSULAR RELATIONS
    U.S. Supreme Court, by vote of 6 to 3, declines either to apply exclusionary rule or to fashion exception to state forfeiture rules when state authorities fail to notify foreign detainees of their rights to contact their respective consulates pursuant to Article 36 of Vienna Convention on Consular Relations
  • GENEVA CONVENTIONS
    In 5 to 3 vote, U.S. Supreme Court holds that military commissions set up by Executive Branch to try Guantanamo Bay detainees violate not only U.S. law but also 1949 Geneva Conventions
  • JURISDICTION (PERSONAL)
    On appeal from dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction under New York’s long-arm statute, Second Circuit holds that lower court erred in failing to take into account in-state contacts which underlay contract that gave rise to challenged arbitration award
  • LETTERS ROGATORY (EVIDENCE)
    Ontario Court of Appeal upholds enforcement of Canadian Plaintiff’s request for Letters Rogatory in U.S. securities fraud class action which orders production of voluminous accounting documents by Canadian branch of accounting firm
  • PRIVACY, RIGHT TO
    European Court of Justice annuls agreement between European Council and United States government to authorize exchange of personal data on European airline passengers on flights to and from European Union and United States on grounds that security matters lie outside powers of European Union
  • SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY
    District of Columbia Circuit rejects argument that expropriation of company stock by Chinese government qualifies as “commercial activity” within the meaning of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
  • WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
    In complaint filed by United States, WTO panel finds European Community customs law administration inconsistent at several points with GATT 1994 trading rules on uniformity and independence





Not to be reproduced in any form or media without the prior written permission of the publisher. This publication is designed to provide accurate information regarding the subject matter covered, and is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. The advertisements displayed on this medium are do not express the views of International Law Update.